↓ Skip to main content

Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan Brimhall, Samuel Han, Philip D Tatman, Toshimasa J Clark, Sachin Wani, Brian Brauer, Steven Edmundowicz, Mihir S Wagh, Augustin Attwell, Hazem Hammad, Raj J Shah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 20%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,252,935
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1,662
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,366
of 335,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#31
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.