| Title |
Proposing a validation scheme for 13C metabolite tracer studies in high-resolution mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-019-01773-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michaela Schwaiger-Haber, Gerrit Hermann, Yasin El Abiead, Evelyn Rampler, Stefanie Wernisch, Kelli Sas, Subramaniam Pennathur, Gunda Koellensperger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,073,220
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,995
of 9,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,606
of 366,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#77
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.