↓ Skip to main content

Human Rights and War Through Civilian Eyes by Thomas W. Smith

Overview of attention for article published in Human Rights Review, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Human Rights and War Through Civilian Eyes by Thomas W. Smith
Published in
Human Rights Review, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12142-019-0556-4
Authors

Saeed Bagheri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,981,241
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Human Rights Review
#209
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,165
of 367,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Rights Review
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.