| Title |
Training Improves Interobserver Reliability for the Diagnosis of Scaphoid Fracture Displacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2260-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geert A. Buijze, Thierry G. Guitton, C. Niek van Dijk, David Ring, The Science of Variation Group |
| Abstract |
The diagnosis of displacement in scaphoid fractures is notorious for poor interobserver reliability. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 29% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,337
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,133
of 253,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#49
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.