| Title |
Screening for distant metastases in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: the impact of different imaging modalities on distant recurrence-free interval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-019-05205-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid G. M. Poodt, Robert-Jan Schipper, Bianca T. A. de Greef, Guusje Vugts, Adriana J. G. Maaskant-Braat, Frits H. Jansen, Dirk N. J. Wyndaele, Adri C. Voogd, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,563,539
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,125
of 4,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,557
of 352,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#37
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.