↓ Skip to main content

Effect of N-acetylcysteine on exacerbations of bronchiectasis (BENE): a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Effect of N-acetylcysteine on exacerbations of bronchiectasis (BENE): a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12931-019-1042-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Qi, Yirepanjaing Ailiyaer, Ruijuan Liu, Yan Zhang, Caiyu Li, Mingtao Liu, Xiuxiu Wang, Lijun Jing, Yu Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 36 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 35 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,152
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,243
of 366,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#25
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.