You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41416-019-0446-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelly Metcalfe, Andrea Eisen, Leigha Senter, Susan Armel, Louise Bordeleau, Wendy S. Meschino, Tuya Pal, Henry T. Lynch, Nadine M. Tung, Ava Kwong, Peter Ainsworth, Beth Karlan, Pal Moller, Charis Eng, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Ping Sun, Jan Lubinski, Steven A. Narod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 41 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,509,189
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#667
of 10,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,659
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#16
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.