| Title |
Ethnomedicinal Investigation of Medicinal Plants of Chakrata Region (Uttarakhand) Used in the Traditional Medicine for Diabetes by Jaunsari Tribe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Products and Bioprospecting, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13659-019-0202-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ankit Kumar, Sonali Aswal, Ashutosh Chauhan, Ruchi Badoni Semwal, Abhimanyu Kumar, Deepak Kumar Semwal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,393,727
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Natural Products and Bioprospecting
#27
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,653
of 352,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Products and Bioprospecting
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.