You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clonotypic heterogeneity in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides) revealed by comprehensive whole-exome sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Blood Advances, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027482 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aishwarya Iyer, Dylan Hennessey, Sandra O'Keefe, Jordan Patterson, Weiwei Wang, Thomas Salopek, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Robert Gniadecki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,933,435
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Blood Advances
#1,066
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,022
of 352,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Advances
#50
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.