You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dengue and Zika Virus 5′ Untranslated Regions Harbor Internal Ribosomal Entry Site Functions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
mBio, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1128/mbio.00459-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yutong Song, JoAnn Mugavero, Charles B. Stauft, Eckard Wimmer, Peter Sarnow, Charles Rice |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,334,306
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from mBio
#4,126
of 6,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,784
of 367,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mBio
#131
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.