↓ Skip to main content

SL2MF: Predicting Synthetic Lethality in Human Cancers via Logistic Matrix Factorization

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SL2MF: Predicting Synthetic Lethality in Human Cancers via Logistic Matrix Factorization
Published in
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, April 2019
DOI 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2909908
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Liu, Min Wu, Chenghao Liu, Xiao-Li Li, Jie Zheng

Abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) is a promising concept for novel discovery of anti-cancer drug targets. However, wet-lab experiments for detecting SLs are faced with various challenges, such as high cost, low consistency across platforms or cell lines. Therefore, computational prediction methods are needed to address these issues. This paper proposes a novel SL prediction method, named SL 2 MF, which employs logistic matrix factorization to learn latent representations of genes from the observed SL data. The probability that two genes are likely to form SL is modeled by the linear combination of gene latent vectors. As known SL pairs are more trustworthy than unknown pairs, we design importance weighting schemes to assign higher importance weights for known SL pairs and lower importance weights for unknown pairs in SL 2 MF. Moreover, we also incorporate biological knowledge about genes from protein-protein interaction (PPI) data and Gene Ontology (GO). In particular, we calculate the similarity between genes based on their GO annotations and topological properties in the PPI network. Extensive experiments on the SL interaction data from SynLethDB database have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of SL 2 MF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
#671
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,802
of 366,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.