| Title |
Effect of caffeinated gum on a battery of rugby-specific tests in trained university-standard male rugby union players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-019-0286-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. K. Ranchordas, H. Pratt, M. Parsons, A. Parry, C. Boyd, A. Lynn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 60 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 95 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,469,850
of 24,911,633 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#340
of 933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,522
of 435,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#321
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,911,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.