↓ Skip to main content

Extractive foraging and the evolution of primate intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in Human Evolution, August 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 103)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Extractive foraging and the evolution of primate intelligence
Published in
Human Evolution, August 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02436709
Authors

B. J. King

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 54 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 35%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 55 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,664,547
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Human Evolution
#40
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,973
of 10,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Evolution
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them