Title |
Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: Comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12350-011-9428-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joëlla E. van Velzen, Fleur R. de Graaf, Michiel A. de Graaf, Joanne D. Schuijf, Lucia J. Kroft, Albert de Roos, Johan H. C. Reiber, Jeroen J. Bax, J. Wouter Jukema, Eric Boersma, Martin J. Schalij, Ernst E. van der Wall |
Abstract |
The purpose of the study was to systematically compare calcification patterns in plaques on computed tomography angiography (CTA) with plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis (IVUS-VH). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,252,457
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,287
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,718
of 130,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.