| Title |
Early maladaptive schemas as predictors of maternal bonding to the unborn child
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40359-019-0297-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dag Nordahl, Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt, Agnes Bohne, Inger Pauline Landsem, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson Wang, Jens C. Thimm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,842,942
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#354
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,082
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.