You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring women’s preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Rupert Fletcher, Rachel Rowe, Jennifer Hollowell, Miranda Scanlon, Lisa Hinton, Oliver Rivero-Arias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 66 | 58% |
| Ireland | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 61% |
| Scientists | 22 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2019.
All research outputs
#563,152
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,679
of 223,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,545
of 367,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#124
of 2,865 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,865 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.