| Title |
Eye-tracking for assessing medical image interpretation: A pilot feasibility study comparing novice vs expert cardiologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40037-019-0505-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tad T. Brunyé, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Joann G. Elmore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,551,539
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#268
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,441
of 366,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.