↓ Skip to main content

A general method for the classification of forest stands using species composition and vertical and horizontal structure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 944)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
A general method for the classification of forest stands using species composition and vertical and horizontal structure
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0824-0
Authors

Miquel De Cáceres, Santiago Martín-Alcón, Jose Ramón González-Olabarria, Lluís Coll

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 35%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,063,055
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#39
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,388
of 366,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.