↓ Skip to main content

N, F-Codoped Microporous Carbon Nanofibers as Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for ORR

Overview of attention for article published in Nano-Micro Letters, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
N, F-Codoped Microporous Carbon Nanofibers as Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for ORR
Published in
Nano-Micro Letters, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40820-019-0240-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianle Gong, Ruoyu Qi, Xundao Liu, Hong Li, Yongming Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 20%
Chemical Engineering 3 9%
Energy 3 9%
Materials Science 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,564,621
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#908
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,026
of 437,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.