| Title |
Combining supervised run interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training with the diabetes prevention program on clinical outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04137-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole M. Gilbertson, Joan A. Mandelson, Kathryn Hilovsky, Jeremy D. Akers, Trent A. Hargens, David L. Wenos, Elizabeth S. Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Greece | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,682
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,395
of 365,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#32
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.