↓ Skip to main content

L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an “ideal” result in Lenke 5 curves

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an “ideal” result in Lenke 5 curves
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-05960-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Phillips, Burt Yaszay, Tracey P. Bastrom, Suken A. Shah, Baron S. Lonner, Firoz Miyanji, Amer F. Samdani, Stefan Parent, Jahangir Asghar, Patrick J. Cahill, Peter O. Newton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 27%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,014,818
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#869
of 4,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,335
of 352,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#34
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.