↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Blood Cultures in Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of Blood Cultures in Pneumonia
Published in
American Journal of Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Zhang, Danny Yang, Anil N Makam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#6,473
of 7,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,515
of 365,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#68
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.