| Title |
Moving forward on the sampling efficiency of neotropical small mammals: insights from pitfall and camera trapping over traditional live trapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammal Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13364-019-00429-2 |
| Authors |
Ana Filipa Palmeirim, Maíra Benchimol, Carlos A. Peres, Marcus Vinícius Vieira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 36% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,579,247
of 24,335,784 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#39
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,580
of 357,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,335,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.