Title |
Technology usage lags
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Economic Growth, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10887-008-9035-5 |
Authors |
Diego Comin, Bart Hobijn, Emilie Rovito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 30 | 48% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,043,184
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Growth
#129
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,599
of 98,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Growth
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them