↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal variations of Google searches for joint swelling: implications for patient-reported outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Seasonal variations of Google searches for joint swelling: implications for patient-reported outcomes
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10067-019-04534-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sizheng Zhao, Stephen J. Duffield, David M Hughes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,677,511
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,373
of 3,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,389
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#50
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.