| Title |
Construction of an in vivo human spinal cord atlas based on high-resolution MR images at cervical and thoracic levels: preliminary results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10334-013-0403-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Taso, Arnaud Le Troter, Michaël Sdika, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva, Maxime Guye, Monique Bernard, Virginie Callot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,069,667
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#99
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,658
of 204,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.