| Title |
Comparative analysis of the rhizomicrobiome of the wild versus cultivated crop: insights from rice and soybean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00203-019-01638-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaohua Shi, Jingjing Chang, Lei Tian, Fahad Nasir, Li Ji, Xiujun Li, Chunjie Tian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 30% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,810,231
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#24
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,719
of 358,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.