↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term loss to follow‐up in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD)

Overview of attention for article published in HIV Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term loss to follow‐up in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD)
Published in
HIV Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.1111/hiv.12734
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Jiamsakul, S Kiertiburanakul, OT Ng, R Chaiwarith, W Wong, R Ditangco, KV Nguyen, A Avihingsanon, S Pujari, CD Do, M‐P Lee, PS Ly, E Yunihastuti, N Kumarasamy, A Kamarulzaman, J Tanuma, F Zhang, JY Choi, P Kantipong, BLH Sim, J Ross, M Law, TP Merati, the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database of IeDEA Asia‐Pacific

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 30 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,486,747
of 24,046,191 outputs
Outputs from HIV Medicine
#200
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,916
of 356,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV Medicine
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,046,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.