↓ Skip to main content

1・3非水溶媒中のpH測定法と標準緩衝溶液

Overview of attention for article published in Bunseki Kagaku, January 1973
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1・3非水溶媒中のpH測定法と標準緩衝溶液
Published in
Bunseki Kagaku, January 1973
DOI 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.22.1275
Authors

大滝 仁志

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#19,910,593
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from Bunseki Kagaku
#295
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,573
of 17,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bunseki Kagaku
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.