| Title |
Case for Validated Instead of Standard Cut-Offs for SARC-CalF
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-019-1177-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W.S. Lim, J. Chew, J.P. Lim, L. Tay, N. Hafizah, Y.Y. Ding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,982,712
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,405
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,120
of 365,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.