↓ Skip to main content

Phase transitions in the neuropercolation model of neural populations with mixed local and non-local interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Phase transitions in the neuropercolation model of neural populations with mixed local and non-local interactions
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00422-005-0565-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Kozma, Marko Puljic, Paul Balister, Bela Bollobás, Walter J. Freeman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
France 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 73 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 24%
Computer Science 12 14%
Physics and Astronomy 7 8%
Mathematics 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,358
of 57,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them