| Title |
The MacGyver bias and attraction of homemade devices in healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-019-01361-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura V. Duggan, Stuart D. Marshall, Jeanette Scott, Peter G. Brindley, Hilary P. Grocott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 26 | 16% |
| Australia | 16 | 10% |
| United States | 16 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 7% |
| France | 6 | 4% |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 20% |
| Scientists | 11 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#297,402
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#13
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,253
of 367,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.