| Title |
Piper’s question and ours: a role for adversity in group-centred views of non-agentive shame
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Continental Philosophy Review, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11007-018-9455-7 |
| Authors |
Basil Vassilicos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,017,246
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#159
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,616
of 436,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.