↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Efficacy of Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic ROS1-Rearranged Lung Cancer (EUCROSS): A European Phase II Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Efficacy of Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic ROS1-Rearranged Lung Cancer (EUCROSS): A European Phase II Clinical Trial
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Michels, Bartomeu Massutí, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Jeremy Franklin, Martin Sebastian, Enriqueta Felip, Christian Grohé, Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu, Diana S Y Abdulla, Helge Bischoff, Christian Brandts, Enric Carcereny, Jesús Corral, Anne-Marie C Dingemans, Eva Pereira, Jana Fassunke, Rieke N Fischer, Masyar Gardizi, Lukas Heukamp, Amelia Insa, Anna Kron, Roopika Menon, Thorsten Persigehl, Martin Reck, Richard Riedel, Sacha I Rothschild, Andreas H Scheel, Matthias Scheffler, Petra Schmalz, Egbert F Smit, Meike Limburg, Mariano Provencio, Niki Karachaliou, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Martin Hellmich, Lucia Nogova, Reinhard Büttner, Rafael Rosell, Jürgen Wolf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 43 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 49 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,117,611
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#365
of 3,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,761
of 366,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.