↓ Skip to main content

セーフティとセキュリティの区別

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 105)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
セーフティとセキュリティの区別
Published in
Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering, June 1994
DOI 10.18943/safety.33.3_196
Authors

秋田 一雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,432,468
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering
#12
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,381
of 20,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them