↓ Skip to main content

Do shared etiological factors contribute to the relationship between sexual orientation and depression?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do shared etiological factors contribute to the relationship between sexual orientation and depression?
Published in
Psychological Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1017/s0033291711001577
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. P. Zietsch, K. J. H. Verweij, A. C. Heath, P. A. F. Madden, N. G. Martin, E. C. Nelson, M. T. Lynskey

Abstract

Gays, lesbians and bisexuals (i.e. non-heterosexuals) have been found to be at much greater risk for many psychiatric symptoms and disorders, including depression. This may be due in part to prejudice and discrimination experienced by non-heterosexuals, but studies controlling for minority stress, or performed in very socially liberal countries, suggest that other mechanisms must also play a role. Here we test the viability of common cause (shared genetic or environmental etiology) explanations of elevated depression rates in non-heterosexuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 30%
Social Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 57 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#715,456
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#341
of 5,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,715
of 135,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.