↓ Skip to main content

Heritability and genome-wide association study of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the eMERGE network

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heritability and genome-wide association study of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the eMERGE network
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42427-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacklyn N. Hellwege, Sarah Stallings, Eric S. Torstenson, Robert Carroll, Kenneth M. Borthwick, Murray H. Brilliant, David Crosslin, Adam Gordon, George Hripcsak, Gail P. Jarvik, James G. Linneman, Parimala Devi, Peggy L. Peissig, Patrick A. M. Sleiman, Hakon Hakonarson, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Shefali Setia Verma, Ning Shang, Josh C. Denny, Dan M. Roden, Digna R. Velez Edwards, Todd L. Edwards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,677,511
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#94,757
of 125,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,467
of 350,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,846
of 3,670 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,670 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.