| Title |
Prognostic effect of VEGF gene variants in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Angiogenesis, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10456-019-09668-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivana Sullivan, Pau Riera, Marta Andrés, Albert Altés, Margarita Majem, Remei Blanco, Laia Capdevila, Andrés Barba, Agustí Barnadas, Juliana Salazar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 63% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,281,645
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#31
of 542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,071
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them