↓ Skip to main content

A Debate that Fatigues…: To Randomise or Not to Randomise; What’s the Real Question?

Overview of attention for article published in The European Journal of Development Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
A Debate that Fatigues…: To Randomise or Not to Randomise; What’s the Real Question?
Published in
The European Journal of Development Research, March 2019
DOI 10.1057/s41287-019-00198-3
Authors

Ralitza Dimova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 64%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from The European Journal of Development Research
#552
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,164
of 354,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Journal of Development Research
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.