| Title |
How Well Does the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Fund Primary Care and Comparative Effectiveness Research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-04990-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Balster, Stephany Mazur, Andrew Bazemore, Daniel J. Merenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#864,481
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#726
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,684
of 354,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#24
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.