| Title |
Pliny the Elder, Paolo Armileo and the Antiquarian Reception of the Portus Augusti Ravennatis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of the Classical Tradition, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12138-019-00527-1 |
| Authors |
Federico Ugolini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,446,516
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of the Classical Tradition
#64
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,944
of 352,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of the Classical Tradition
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.