You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Video strategies improved health professional knowledge across different contexts: a helix counterbalanced randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitchell N Sarkies, Stephen Maloney, Mark Symmons, Terry P Haines |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 35% |
| Canada | 4 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 23% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,736,933
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#1,029
of 4,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,272
of 347,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#36
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.