↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Mass coral bleaching of P. versipora in Sydney Harbour driven by the 2015–2016 heatwave

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Mass coral bleaching of P. versipora in Sydney Harbour driven by the 2015–2016 heatwave
Published in
Coral Reefs, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00338-019-01805-9
Authors

Samantha Goyen, Emma F. Camp, Lisa Fujise, Alicia Lloyd, Matthew R. Nitschke, Todd C. LaJeunesse, Tim Kahlke, Peter J. Ralph, David Suggett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,702,774
of 23,335,153 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#1,370
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,873
of 319,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#39
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,335,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.