| Title |
Short- versus long-course therapy in gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-019-03467-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Sousa, María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez, Milagros Suárez, Nuria Val, Lucía Martínez-Lamas, Andrés Nodar, Rebeca Longueira, Manuel Crespo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 46% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,008,010
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#117
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,383
of 449,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.