You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical features and genetic background of the sympatric species Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Paracoccidioides americana
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007309 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Priscila Marques de Macedo, Marcus de Melo Teixeira, Bridget M. Barker, Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira, Rodrigo Almeida-Paes, Antonio Carlos Francesconi do Valle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
Guatemala | 1 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Peru | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Scientists | 7 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,822,293
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,596
of 9,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,272
of 365,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#58
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.