You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploratory trial of a biepitopic CAR T-targeting B cell maturation antigen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1819745116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Xu, Li-Juan Chen, Shuang-Shuang Yang, Yan Sun, Wen Wu, Yuan-Fang Liu, Ji Xu, Yan Zhuang, Wu Zhang, Xiang-Qin Weng, Jing Wu, Yan Wang, Jin Wang, Hua Yan, Wen-Bin Xu, Hua Jiang, Juan Du, Xiao-Yi Ding, Biao Li, Jun-Min Li, Wei-Jun Fu, Jiang Zhu, Li Zhu, Zhu Chen, Xiao-Hu Frank Fan, Jian Hou, Jian-Yong Li, Jian-Qing Mi, Sai-Juan Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 27% |
| France | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 64% |
| Scientists | 11 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 95 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#683,384
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#11,481
of 104,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,334
of 368,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#235
of 983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.