↓ Skip to main content

Penoscrotal edema: a case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Penoscrotal edema: a case report and literature review
Published in
BMC Urology, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12894-019-0456-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tian Lin, Yun-Zhi Lin, Yu-Peng Wu, Ting-Ting Lin, Dong-Ning Chen, Yong Wei, Xue-Yi Xue, Ning Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,677,511
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#525
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,467
of 350,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.