↓ Skip to main content

Probenecid Blocks Human P2X7 Receptor-Induced Dye Uptake via a Pannexin-1 Independent Mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probenecid Blocks Human P2X7 Receptor-Induced Dye Uptake via a Pannexin-1 Independent Mechanism
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0093058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Archana Bhaskaracharya, Phuong Dao-Ung, Iman Jalilian, Mari Spildrejorde, Kristen K. Skarratt, Stephen J. Fuller, Ronald Sluyter, Leanne Stokes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,839,167
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#124,108
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,573
of 224,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,258
of 5,399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.