↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Differential Antibody and T-Cell Responses to the Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoite Malaria Vaccine, PfSPZ Vaccine, by Age in Tanzanian Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Infants

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Differential Antibody and T-Cell Responses to the Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoite Malaria Vaccine, PfSPZ Vaccine, by Age in Tanzanian Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Infants
Published in
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, April 2019
DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Said A Jongo, L W Preston Church, Ali T Mtoro, Sumana Chakravarty, Adam J Ruben, Phillip A Swanson, Kamaka R Kassim, Maximillian Mpina, Anneth-Mwasi Tumbo, Florence A Milando, Munira Qassim, Omar A Juma, Bakari M Bakari, Beatus Simon, Eric R James, Yonas Abebe, Natasha Kc, Elizabeth Saverino, Linda Gondwe, Fabian Studer, Martina Fink, Glenda Cosi, Jill El-Khorazaty, David Styers, Robert A Seder, Tobias Schindler, Peter F Billingsley, Claudia Daubenberger, B Kim Lee Sim, Marcel Tanner, Thomas L Richie, Salim Abdulla, Stephen L Hoffman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 51 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 59 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,155,925
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#1,297
of 9,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,758
of 364,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#21
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.