| Title |
WRKY transcription factors: evolution, binding, and action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytopathology Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42483-019-0022-x |
| Authors |
Xujun Chen, Cheng Li, Han Wang, Zejian Guo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,264,391
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology Research
#9
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,395
of 347,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.